Drowning in email? Try Inbox Zero to learn sane tips for dealing with high-volume email. And don’t miss the free Inbox Zero video. »
Register for free on 43 Folders to comment on articles, post to our forum, customize your visits, and much more. Current users can login now.
Blog Pimping, or: Who Do You Want to Delight?
Merlin Mann | Jul 21 2008
My favorite bloggers are great at articulating something I feel in my gut — but they regularly present it better, more clearly, and (on days like today), more succinctly than I ever could. Such is the case with Jack Shedd’s post, “Tacky,” a razor-sharp polemic on the industry of cheese-food manufacturing that “pro blogging” has turned into.
For myself, I think there’s nothing wrong with having a blog and wanting to make money with it. Obviously. But I also hold an increasingly old-fashioned view that you ought to start with something you’re passionate about sharing with people — something besides how to make easy money with a blog — and try to build an audience of people you respect based on producing work you’re happy with or even proud of. Consequently, I very much agree with Jack’s thoughts on audience-building.
Seconded. If you do not agree with Jack’s or my opinion on building your audience — or if you think this is an unrealistically conservative tactic for simps and losers — consider this: I learned about Big Contrarian from reading a blogger I trust and respect: John Gruber. Today, the chances are good that at least a few of you might visit Jack’s site for the first time because you learned about it from someone you (theoretically) trust and respect: me. If you like Jack’s stuff as much as Chairman Gruber and I do, I’ll bet you’ll tell others about it through your own sites or through emails, IRL conversations, and what have you. And the music goes round. Organically. Jack didn’t beg a link, he didn’t pretend to be 50,000 peoples’ “friend,” and he didn’t concoct a bunch of tricks, games, and page-padding bullshit in an attempt to increase views and time-on-site. Jack didn’t do anything except write a great blog. It’s up to his readers to do the rest. If what you’re doing is interesting and appeals to someone, that’s all you need. Seriously. So, yes, if that wasn’t a clear enough recommendation: read Jack’s blog, Big Contrarian, and tell your friends about it. Jack gets this stuff, and his combination of links and commentary is, not coincidentally, reminiscent of blogging’s salad days. When people were more excited about what they had to say than with figuring out how to make it palatable to readers who’d prefer the entire web be re-formatted as a series of retardate lists. If you watched The Wire, I’ll bet you walked away with the same piece of wisdom that I did — the thread that ran through every episode of every season, and that was articulated by the show’s creator, David Simon, in the DVD narration of the very first scene from The Wire:
This is one of the most insightful things I’ve ever heard someone related to the TV business say, and I happen to believe it’s true of any industry, institution, or, for that matter, adult decision: you make decisions and you accept trade-offs. It’s true if you’re the Mayor, or a homicide cop, or a heroin addict, and damn it, it’s true if you’re a blogger in his or her underpants trying to make bank in a competitive marketplace. You make decisions and you accept trade-offs. You decide whether or not to run ads. You decide whether or not to include Amazon affiliate links. You decide whether or not to edit posts after publication. You decide whether or not to accept free shit like trips and demo units. You decide how black of an SEO hat you’re willing to wear. You decide whether people will notice (or care) when your ten-paragraph link post is spread out over 11 pages (“It’s a Gallery!”). You make, erase, and re-draw lines until you’re comfortable with the mix. You evolve and you struggle to find your place in the system. No one is perfect 100% of the time, and sometimes we all change our minds, realize we’re dead wrong, or we just try different things for the hell of it. At least that’s been the case for me on every point. But, ultimately, our most important decision may be deciding who we want to please, and what we’re willing to do, allow, insert, or put up with that potentially will make those people love, hate, or even feel indifferent toward our sites and our work. Not only must we contend with the institution, we also have to figure out who we want to delight and how. That’s where the art is, and it’s arguably the turning point for whether a young blog will get noticed or won’t. Want to build a great audience, composed of people you respect? Be picky about who you decide to overserve. Then do it with all the skill and enthusiasm you can muster. While it might seem dim to say “the rest takes care of itself,” it is entirely true and fair to say “smart readers will always bring along their smart friends.” It’s why you’re here, and it’s why I am very grateful that you allow me to try and delight you as best I can. Even when the posts are this long. UPDATE 2008-07-21 11:08:47: Fixed a dumb typo on Jack’s name. 15 Comments
POSTED IN:
SecondedSubmitted by Aaron Stannard on July 21, 2008 - 11:02am.
I’ve had this discussion with a few other bloggers - it’s a damn shame that the market drives us to produce “cotton candy content.” On my personal blog I finally made the choice to forgo all of that lucrative linkbait traffic and stick to writing stuff that I find compelling. The response has been a decrease in traffic, which I expected, but I’ve found that I’m getting comments more consistently from readers. I’ll forgo the social media votes, I’ll forgo the traffic, but if I can get one or two people to read what I have to say at a deep level and then have them give me some feedback, then that means a lot more to me. Might not mean a big boost in RSS subscribers overnight, but having something unique to say and having an audience who appreciates that uniqueness for what it is means a lot. » POSTED IN:
Well saidSubmitted by Writer Dad on July 21, 2008 - 11:46am.
I’ve been wanting to start a blog for a while now. It seems like everyone is offering the same dozen ways to pave the road to glory. It’s disheartening. I just want to write. I don’t want to draft list after list, and as nice as it would be to get to the front page of Digg, I don’t want to be anyone other than me to get there. Hopefully, since everything in life seems to be cyclical, this won’t be too much different. The internet is supposed to be about every voice getting out, and the best ones rising to the surface; not the same hundred things said in a thousand different ways. » POSTED IN:
Oh THANK GODSubmitted by delia on August 2, 2008 - 7:56am.
I am with Writer Dad - after working for THE MAN for over 10 years I finally started my own business and a blog last year. Technology really got away from me in the late 90s and all of a sudden I’m so far out of the loop - I can’t even see the damn thing from here. I’m embarrassed to say that in a fit of desperation and naivete I subscribed to a couple of the more viral blog-roaches to learn how I could supplement my now meager income with my blog. silly rabbit. I am SO glad to have read this post - I was on the verge of coming to this conclusion myself - but now I feel a little validated. I’m a pretty good writer but I’ve never been very good at pimping myself out (hence my incredibly short tenure as a defense attorney). My blog gives me a forum and forces me to write every day - which is the only way I’m going to get better at it. If I make some cash from that, great, if not - fine. If I never get a commission check from AdSense or Quickbooks, it doesn’t make my posts any less compelling or valid. So I’ve sentenced Yaro Starak (I know, don’t even start) to my gulag of blocked senders and I’m going to post something today just because, god forbid, I feel like writing. » POSTED IN:
The same can be said of comments...Submitted by mandaris on July 21, 2008 - 12:02pm.
I’d like to step forward and say it. I. AM. A. COMMENT. WHORE. I don’t know when it happened, but somewhere along the lines I found myself making comments that don’t move the conversation of the post forward. (You can look at the comment I made about quicksilver earlier this month on this site.) It seems like people want to be part of electronic cacophony of the internet so bad that they don’t take the time to think about why and what they they put in the cloud. » POSTED IN:
Same hereSubmitted by runningman on July 21, 2008 - 12:12pm.
I started reading Big Contrarian via Gruber too. I agree 100% with your thoughts Merlin! » POSTED IN:
It's definitely a dream for a lot of folks nowadays.Submitted by cbowler on July 21, 2008 - 1:16pm.
It’s your fault—guys like you and chairman Gruber are living the dream. Like Jack says, to be paid to write about things you enjoy—it doesn’t seem to get much better. Not sure I’d pee on the table though. » POSTED IN:
Re: It's definitely a dream for a lot of folks nowadays.Submitted by Merlin Mann on July 21, 2008 - 1:42pm.
Absolutely. But especially, in John’s case (or Dooce, or Andy Baio, or Kottke, or on and on and on), it all starts with having something to say and a distinctive voice to say it with. It decidedly does not start with “Hey, how can I turn a Blogspot account and 3 AdSense units into an ‘income muse?’” What I find baffling is the number of people who seem determined to try and replicate the success or traffic of a popular site by a) jumping into a crowded and over-saturated topic like “Web 2.0”, then b) spending 90% of their time on BS marketing and link farming while c) spending next to no time on creating something new — or providing context and curation for something old. When I put this site up in 2004, I had no idea what it might turn into. I’m still trying to figure that out every day. But I can promise you that it didn’t start with the idea of “how can I turn a home page into a job?” I have no opinion about urinating on furniture, but I see no reason Jack couldn’t urinate on anything he chose to. » POSTED IN:
Content is kingSubmitted by cbowler on July 21, 2008 - 3:20pm.
There's no doubt the names you listed—and your stuff here—have attracted a large audience because of the quality of the content they provide. They've developed a voice, been consistent and people now trust them to provide downstream content. And now that the Internet is flooded with so many blogs, so many of which regurgitate or 'play the numbers game', it's harder for those who saw what the pioneers did (Gruber, Kottke etc.) and attempted to do something similar, to actually get heard. I started my own blog with the hope that one day I can do this kind of thing full time as well. But only by providing quality content, content that I care about and that I can look on with pride. If that never happens, I'll still be thankful for the relationships I've built and the fact that I've improved my writing skills (hopefully). And if you're not having fun, then it's just another job. I already have one of those. » POSTED IN:
The wild west has been suburbanizedSubmitted by communicatrix on July 21, 2008 - 3:39pm.
And now that the Internet is flooded with so many blogs, so many of which regurgitate or 'play the numbers game', it's harder for those who saw what the pioneers did (Gruber, Kottke etc.) and attempted to do something similar, to actually get heard. I feel like I got into this whole blogging thing in the early Deadwood days--late 2004, sometime around when Merlin did. Just like the show, you got that feeling you were in the last throes of open territory, where people were still out there doing crazy sh*t because they dug it, and only because they dug it. I think there's a direct correlation b/w the numbers of people I hear about abandoning their feed readers and the kudzu overgrowth that social media blogging hath wrought (and to be fair, it's spilled over into other sectors: as soon as everyone feels they *have* to have a blog, you're in trouble.) I started blogging to find my voice and damned if it didn't work. That is a wonderful reason to start a blog, which I'll tell anyone who's considering it. There are other great reasons to start a blog: because it's a relatively easy way to get information out there; because it's a relatively easy way to connect with people who share your (arcane, especially) interest; even because it can be a great way to establish yourself as an expert. But not on blogging. Or (gack) social media. That ship has sailed, folks. » POSTED IN:
Re: Blog Pimping, or: Who Do You Want to Delight?Submitted by Darren Rowse on July 21, 2008 - 4:14pm.
funnily enough I agree with much of what Jack writes when it comes to blogging out of passion rather than blogging out of a desire to grow rich. The thing is that as one of the ‘infomercial’ blogs that he mentions I am blogging about my passion - blogging and communication and have encouraged others to do the same on countless occasions. Starting with what YOU are about when you start a blog is the best advice I think any new blogger could be given. “Write well, write often, and write with passion.” “If you’re worth reading, someone will read you. If you’re worth watching, someone will watch you. If you’re worth hearing, someone will listen.” These are the parts of what Jack’s written that stand out to me as ringing most true to me as a blogger - to a point. I admire and embrace the sentiment and have found it to be true - to a point. I look at 43Folders for example and while at it’s core is amazing content that you’re obviously passionate about - I also see a blogger who is willing to put himself out there and interact with people in different forums and via different mediums (Video with Leo L, Speaking at companies, conferences, Twitter, Vimeo, Flickr etc). I also see a blog that has obviously invested into branding and marketing itself (and it’s founder) brilliantly. None of these things make it bad - but all of them helped to build this blog. At it’s heart is the mantra of “Write well, write often, and write with passion.” - but I guess what I’m trying to say is that there’s more involved in building an audience than simply great writing - at least that’s my experience. Just my two cents worth. » POSTED IN:
Abolutely right, mostlySubmitted by CuriousG on July 21, 2008 - 9:45pm.
I really appreciated the gist of this post too. Being clear on your purpose and passion is key, and a good reminder for me. Maybe that is one reason so many people do go for recycled, unoriginal content and digg oriented lists is that being seen is their passion; rather than having a passion that will being seen will result from. And let's face it. No matter how hard we work, not everyone is going to end up being the next Merlin Mann. I'm coming at this whole blogging thing another direction. I already have an established business. The blogging began as a way to communicate with clients outside the consulting room, and provide similar content to others who are interested out there. Drawing and maintaining a readership has become a way to make my website more visible so that when local parents are looking for me on google, they're more apt to find me. Now I don't have to pay Google for ads to bring the traffic to me. That's a small and rewarding success in itself. I do like what Darren added to the mix here. I think there are additional complexities to bringing in the readers beyond "if I write from the heart, they will come," though that certainly has some truth heft to it, which it's sounding like we're all resonating with here to one degree or another. Frankly its nice just to hear what people who do this stuff are wrestling with as they go about finding their way. » POSTED IN:
absolutely spot onSubmitted by guyinbali on July 21, 2008 - 10:18pm.
Terrific post. Am glad Darren posted in the comments, as what’s described in Tacky is pretty much exactly why I stopped reading Problogger. » POSTED IN:
It’s the current culturalSubmitted by fred.andres on July 22, 2008 - 2:44pm.
It’s the current cultural state of the internet. We see it in forums, ad hoc blogs, and [insert web two-point-waste-of-time service]. Would this have gone on or even be considered acceptable in 1995? Possibly, but it didn’t because of accessibility limitations and shallow monetary gains. People tend to lose their hat at the thought of getting rich quickly. Until the users of the internet begin to hold themselves to a much higher regard in the way they act in public, I doubt we’ll see any change. » POSTED IN:
Pro blogging vs blogging about pro bloggingSubmitted by ginatrapani on July 23, 2008 - 9:54am.
As an employee in the cheese-food manufacturing industry that is "pro blogging", posts like these always pique my interest. A couple of thoughts. First, my impression of Shedd's original sentiment is that blogging about pro blogging is tacky, not pro blogging itself (which is what Merlin seems to be saying). It's true that many new-school blogs' marketing techniques can make a pre 2002 blogger's skin crawl (myself included). But blogging about blogging and pro blogging is not inherently tacky or badly done. It depends on the site. I'd like to see more bloggers lead by example and point out good examples (like Merlin has here with Shedd's blog) than do blanket indictments of all blogs that have gotten popular. Having given this subject extensive thought (because it's involved in pretty much every editorial decision I make at Lifehacker), I wish more folks having this conversation would acknowledge that there are many facets to all of this. For example, it's unfair to say that list posts are written solely by lazy writers for dumb readers. (I love Merlin's 5ives site, for example--witty brainfood.) That appealing to the "lowest common denominator" is being a sell-out. That sticking to a particular topic on a web site is not being true to your multi-faceted artistic self or whatever. The other way to look at it is this: there's a usefulness and nobility in making media accessible to people outside of the inner circle. In fact, some of the biggest successes in pop culture involve straddling the delicate line of mainstream appeal and niche in-the-knowness, helping new people discover a new genre, a new topic of interest. A list of informational points--a perfectly fine rhetorical device--is a great way to open the door and welcome someone in for this purpose. When you run a site like Lifehacker that publishes up to 20 posts a day, a weekly list that rounds up all the items on a theme is doing a service for one's readers, not link-baiting. (Now, the whole question of why a site's doing 20 posts a day at all is another issue. I think of us as a radio station--whenever you tune in, there's always something new playing.) I'd like to see Shedd and Merlin and others cite and counter all the crappy blog marketing advice and traffic inflation tricks with specific examples of how to do it better. Folks who have been on the internet for a long time like them have honed a better sense of where the line between being a douchey marketer and being a real, thoughtful human online is, and a LOT of folks could really benefit from that experience. » POSTED IN:
Good points. The hardestSubmitted by Mashedspud on July 30, 2008 - 10:46pm.
Good points. The hardest part for any blog though, no matter how good the content is, is building the initial base of readers. Once you achieve critical mass, good content alone will be more than enough to promote the blog. Until then though, pimping or some other method of attracting your target audience is essential. Mashedspud Green lasers rulz » POSTED IN:
About Merlin MannBio Merlin Mann is an independent writer, speaker, and broadcaster. He’s best known for being the guy who started the website you’re reading right now. He lives in San Francisco, does lots of public speaking, and helps make cool things like You Look Nice Today. Also? He looks like this, answers questions, and has something like a life. |
|
| EXPLORE 43Folders | THE GOOD STUFF |