43 Folders

Back to Work

Merlin’s weekly podcast with Dan Benjamin. We talk about creativity, independence, and making things you love.

Join us via RSS, iTunes, or at 5by5.tv.

”What’s 43 Folders?”
43Folders.com is Merlin Mann’s website about finding the time and attention to do your best creative work.

Choosing my next Canon lens

Need lens-buying advice from Canon photography nerds.

The Mrs. and Me are starting to really dig taking photos again -- she with a Rebel XT and me with a 30D. We currently share joint custody of 1) the XT's standard 18-55mm zoom (blech) and 2) the glorious and much-loved 50mm f1.4 (yay!).

So, let's say, hypothetically, a fella wanted to pick up a new Canon lens to add to these two cameras' modest arsenal. If we wanted a fast, flexible lens (that would mostly get used for baby picture-taking), what would you guys recommend? Possibly a higher-end, faster zoom?

JonInKrakow's picture

different opinion

I shot for years with a Pentax (manual focus) with a very heavy 35-105 f3.5 lens hanging off if it. While it took some fantastic baby and child pics, I always had two points of dissatisfaction with it. 1. Too heavy, and 2. not wide enough. You tend to shoot your children at very close range, and while the baby may not be crawling yet, the child will soon be quite mobile. At that point, wider will definitely be better, and give you greater flexibility. So, IMO, 24mm on a reduced-frame camera is not enough. 19mm would be the minimum on the wide end.

The weight issue can also become a factor, walking around zoos or whatnot with the child, or even using in the backyard. L lenses are great quality (like my old Pentax), but they take it out of you. ;-) I've only ever once slung an L lens from my ancient D30, but I was amazed at its weight and bulk. I was comparing it, though, to my Tamron 19-35mm.

In fact, that's the lens I would recommend, myself. It does have downsides--3.5-4.5 is its biggest weakness--only one, now that I think about it. Optically, at least on the cropped-frame, it is excellent. And build-wise, it is not so bad as you would think, considering its price. Unlike the cheaper Sigmas and Canon lenses, no plastic mount. It is light, but feels solid. And sheesh, you can buy probably half a dozen for the price of one L lens. ;-) And one advantage of it over an EF-S lens is that if you ever want to strap it onto a full-frame camera. I will work--can't vouch for the image quality at full-frame, but it certainly won't be the worst for distortion. ;-) (and, for the record, I've been surprised at the lack of lens flare on this lens).

Also, at its price, you can get two--one for each camera.

One other downside is that it's not a long lens. It would be advantageous to have more length. Which you may want on one lens. Personally, I find that the vast bulk of my photography is with this lens, though, and I use my longer lens only on occasion.

Those are my thoughts--the thoughs of a nobody photographer, but in a similar situation, goal-wise. :-)

-Jon

 
EXPLORE 43Folders THE GOOD STUFF

Popular
Today

Popular
Classics

An Oblique Strategy:
Honor thy error as a hidden intention


STAY IN THE LOOP:

Subscribe with Google Reader

Subscribe on Netvibes

Add to Technorati Favorites

Subscribe on Pageflakes

Add RSS feed

The Podcast Feed

Cranking

Merlin used to crank. He’s not cranking any more.

This is an essay about family, priorities, and Shakey’s Pizza, and it’s probably the best thing he’s written. »

Scared Shitless

Merlin’s scared. You’re scared. Everybody is scared.

This is the video of Merlin’s keynote at Webstock 2011. The one where he cried. You should watch it. »