Followup/Distraction (Ftrain.com)
Paul Ford, eloquent as usual, on the two kinds of distractions—the wide kind that are the equivalent of a kitty toy for distractible humans, and the narrow kind, which stimulates you to follow a train of thought into tunnels it’s nary entered. Paul concludes, in part:
Distraction is necessary. Minds need to wander to get anything done. But the Internet is sort of the mental equivalent of the snack aisle at a convenience store, filled with satisfying fatty chips and tasty cream-filled cakes. God knows I’ve spent enough time with both the Internet and cream-filled cakes to see the similarities. And I now know that what I want, mentally, is a well-cooked meal. A book gives me that, a well-written, carefully-edited book. Even though your average book is filled with distractions—I mean, Ahab doesn’t just chase the whale. There’s all sorts of stuff in Moby Dick besides that. Otherwise it probably wouldn’t be that good of a book. But the distractions are useful. They get us from one point to another. Sailing wide seas of opinion in a million does not do the same thing. This is not to condemn blogs. They are often great. But there are so many of them, and I will be dead for a long, long time. And on my deathbed do I want to say, I sipped mightily of Metafilter, and saw many video clips that made fun of Rosie O’Donnell, and I am richer for it? Or should I try to make contact with the culture that existed before 1992? The Internet makes it so easy to think that nothing of importance ever took place before the ARPANET was created.
Paul, I should also note, earlier mentions some affection for the AlphaSmart Neo:
The Neo is just a keyboard that stores text as you type it. It does nothing else. It doesn’t tell the time or let me play games. It runs off of double-A batteries and the batteries last for hundreds of hours. Using the AlphaSmart and WordPerfect I’ve started to enjoy computing again. There is no Wikipedia, no email, no constantly changing the MP3s I’m listening to, no downloading going on. The spam still piles up but I’m not aware of it, because my email program is shut down until I want to send a message.
I think I want me one of them.
[ thanks, [Donna](http://www.deliriouscool.org/
I think Mr. Ford has...
I think Mr. Ford has tapped that gnawing in those of us old enough to have been thinking individuals before the ‘net that our intellectual systems were working nicely, thank you, before the advent of “anything, anytime.” He echos my own thoughts of late pulling me back to handwriting, Moleskines instead of .doc files in a well-intentioned folder hierarchy, and shutting down Web connectivity for long periods of good old-fashioned thinking.
If I were a cynic,...
If I were a cynic, I could say it’s just the pendulum swinging the other direction. Since I’m trying to shed my inner cynic, let’s look at this a different way:
A computer gives us many ways to express ourselves, to get things done. While it is tempting to use all the tools at our disposal, gaining mastership in any medium means being able to work with restrained tool sets. In fact, restraints enable expression.
In that light, I don’t think it’s a coincidence we simplify our computer usage as we grow older - hopefully, along the way, while getting older, we learned a bit and have now mastered this medium sufficiently to restrain wisely.
That doesn’t mean computers are inherently bad - but we’re learning when and how to use them, instead of applying them everywhere and anytime.
I'm almost positive that I...
I’m almost positive that I mentioned my affection for the Alphasmart Neo in an earlier comment; it didn’t have the best keyboard “feel”, but it was a fine lofi machine. I think my perfect lofi item would also have a slightly bigger screen…
[...] Holidays, long absences (or...
[…] Holidays, long absences (or large abscesses), and in my case a gynormous move, threaten the very foundation of something like a blog. In reality a blog is incredibly fragile. Mostly carried by the resolve of a single author, a blog is susceptible to all the distractions of a just one brain. While thinking about that I spotted Merlin’s snip of Paul Ford’s take on distraction. […]
[...] Last week, I enjoyed...
[…] Last week, I enjoyed and linked to Paul Ford’s Ftrain post, “Followup/Distraction.” It led to us exchanging a few chatty emails, so I asked Paul to favor us with a deeper write-up on his idea of narrow vs. broad distractions. More specifically, I asked: “Is there such a thing as a good distraction?” […]