Vox Pop: Managing actions from list emails?

Inbox Zero Tech Talk
7/23/2007
00:58:38

During the Q&A portion of my Inbox Zero presentation at Google the other day, an audience member stumped me with a question about how to manage action around mailing list distributions (the question starts at about 48:22).

He said he frequently receives email requests and questions that are also distributed to the other 20 people on his team. He describes a “waiting game” in which team members hang back to see if other people will respond first – at least partly out of not wanting to duplicate effort or flood the sender. I thought it was a really intriguing question, although I said (and still believe) that distributed email would not personally be my first choice to handle this kind of communication.

Well, based on the reaction in the room that day, I gathered that this is a common dilemma for Googlers. Funny thing is that, since the video went up, I’ve received a lot of email from people outside the Googleplex who share the same problem – a few of whom were aghast that I wasn’t aware what a huge pain this is for knowledge workers. And to an extent, I’ll admit those folks were mostly right.

I do know about the pain of being on multiple email lists, and it’s why I’ve spent the last ten years trying desperately to stay off of them. I also know and dread the poorly-worded action request that requires vivisection with a magnifying glass and tweezers.

But I suppose I never really thought about the cumulative effects that distribution lists can have across a company – especially given the geometric nature of their influence, and especially if some 500 emails a day must be monitored and processed for potential action items. That’s just stunning to me.

So: open thread for you email veterans to chime in…

How does your team handle these sorts of distributed requests? How are you personally managing possible actions that stem from email distributions? Are there success stories for the distributed email approach? Anyone found better media than email for managing this stuff? Do we all just need to make our peace with getting 2,000 interoffice emails a week, and move on? What’s the solution?

Hi Merlin, I think the real...

Hi Merlin,

I think the real dilemma lies in the format of Email. If the sender addresses 20 people, he’s bound to get 20 replies. And in most cases, this will list up as 20 separate emails in his Inbox.

Two points concerning this:

  • Gmail solves this neatly using threaded conversations.
  • If the sender asks for 20 opinions, he should be read to deal with 20 opinions.

I think one should be careful with coming up with strange solutions like Wikis and Forums, but in some cases, where group discussion is necessary, this might not be a bad idea. So I suggest they use some REALLy SIMPLE Groupware that’s absolutely low on features and high on discussion. Google Groups comes to mind.

But seriously, it’s a policy flaw. A Boss sending 20 emails is asking for 20 responses.

A good boss should pick one person for one action. If he wants opinions, go to the meeting room (which, if not possible physically, is a Forum arrangement).