43 Folders

Back to Work

Merlin’s weekly podcast with Dan Benjamin. We talk about creativity, independence, and making things you love.

Join us via RSS, iTunes, or at 5by5.tv.

”What’s 43 Folders?”
43Folders.com is Merlin Mann’s website about finding the time and attention to do your best creative work.

Blog Pimping, or: Who Do You Want to Delight?

Big Contrarian → Tacky.

My favorite bloggers are great at articulating something I feel in my gut -- but they regularly present it better, more clearly, and (on days like today), more succinctly than I ever could. Such is the case with Jack Shedd's post, "Tacky," a razor-sharp polemic on the industry of cheese-food manufacturing that "pro blogging" has turned into.

Write top ten lists and whore yourself on many other sites as you possibly can. Don’t be thoughtful, long-winded or interesting. Don’t write about you love, unless what you love is popular on Digg. And for god’s sake don’t even think about writing about more than one topic.

Whether their strategies work or not is slightly beside the point. It’s cheap. It’s marketing driven, instead of content driven. It’s the type of thinking that leads to a sequel to the movie Garfield.

For myself, I think there's nothing wrong with having a blog and wanting to make money with it. Obviously. But I also hold an increasingly old-fashioned view that you ought to start with something you're passionate about sharing with people -- something besides how to make easy money with a blog -- and try to build an audience of people you respect based on producing work you're happy with or even proud of.

Consequently, I very much agree with Jack's thoughts on audience-building.

Despite the utter-bullshit so much of the Anderson’s long tail has proven to be, the core idea that everything finds an audience should be held up and remembered. Clung to fastidiously; A life raft for the ignored, for the invisible.

If you’re worth reading, someone will read you. If you’re worth watching, someone will watch you. If you’re worth hearing, someone will listen.

Seconded.


If you do not agree with Jack's or my opinion on building your audience -- or if you think this is an unrealistically conservative tactic for simps and losers -- consider this: I learned about Big Contrarian from reading a blogger I trust and respect: John Gruber. Today, the chances are good that at least a few of you might visit Jack's site for the first time because you learned about it from someone you (theoretically) trust and respect: me. If you like Jack's stuff as much as Chairman Gruber and I do, I'll bet you'll tell others about it through your own sites or through emails, IRL conversations, and what have you. And the music goes round. Organically.

Jack didn't beg a link, he didn't pretend to be 50,000 peoples' "friend," and he didn't concoct a bunch of tricks, games, and page-padding bullshit in an attempt to increase views and time-on-site. Jack didn't do anything except write a great blog. It's up to his readers to do the rest. If what you're doing is interesting and appeals to someone, that's all you need. Seriously.

So, yes, if that wasn't a clear enough recommendation: read Jack's blog, Big Contrarian, and tell your friends about it. Jack gets this stuff, and his combination of links and commentary is, not coincidentally, reminiscent of blogging's salad days. When people were more excited about what they had to say than with figuring out how to make it palatable to readers who'd prefer the entire web be re-formatted as a series of retardate lists.


If you watched The Wire, I'll bet you walked away with the same piece of wisdom that I did -- the thread that ran through every episode of every season, and that was articulated by the show's creator, David Simon, in the DVD narration of the very first scene from The Wire:

It's about how institutions have an effect on individuals, and how...whether you're a cop, a longshoreman, a drug dealer, a politician, a judge [or] lawyer, you are ultimately compromised and must contend with whatever institution you've committed to.

This is one of the most insightful things I've ever heard someone related to the TV business say, and I happen to believe it's true of any industry, institution, or, for that matter, adult decision: you make decisions and you accept trade-offs. It's true if you're the Mayor, or a homicide cop, or a heroin addict, and damn it, it's true if you're a blogger in his or her underpants trying to make bank in a competitive marketplace. You make decisions and you accept trade-offs.

You decide whether or not to run ads. You decide whether or not to include Amazon affiliate links. You decide whether or not to edit posts after publication. You decide whether or not to accept free shit like trips and demo units. You decide how black of an SEO hat you're willing to wear. You decide whether people will notice (or care) when your ten-paragraph link post is spread out over 11 pages ("It's a Gallery!"). You make, erase, and re-draw lines until you're comfortable with the mix. You evolve and you struggle to find your place in the system.

No one is perfect 100% of the time, and sometimes we all change our minds, realize we're dead wrong, or we just try different things for the hell of it. At least that's been the case for me on every point.

But, ultimately, our most important decision may be deciding who we want to please, and what we're willing to do, allow, insert, or put up with that potentially will make those people love, hate, or even feel indifferent toward our sites and our work. Not only must we contend with the institution, we also have to figure out who we want to delight and how. That's where the art is, and it's arguably the turning point for whether a young blog will get noticed or won't.


Want to build a great audience, composed of people you respect? Be picky about who you decide to overserve. Then do it with all the skill and enthusiasm you can muster.

While it might seem dim to say "the rest takes care of itself," it is entirely true and fair to say "smart readers will always bring along their smart friends." It's why you're here, and it's why I am very grateful that you allow me to try and delight you as best I can. Even when the posts are this long.

UPDATE 2008-07-21 11:08:47: Fixed a dumb typo on Jack's name.

ginatrapani's picture

Pro blogging vs blogging about pro blogging

As an employee in the cheese-food manufacturing industry that is "pro blogging", posts like these always pique my interest. A couple of thoughts.

First, my impression of Shedd's original sentiment is that blogging about pro blogging is tacky, not pro blogging itself (which is what Merlin seems to be saying). It's true that many new-school blogs' marketing techniques can make a pre 2002 blogger's skin crawl (myself included). But blogging about blogging and pro blogging is not inherently tacky or badly done. It depends on the site. I'd like to see more bloggers lead by example and point out good examples (like Merlin has here with Shedd's blog) than do blanket indictments of all blogs that have gotten popular.

Having given this subject extensive thought (because it's involved in pretty much every editorial decision I make at Lifehacker), I wish more folks having this conversation would acknowledge that there are many facets to all of this. For example, it's unfair to say that list posts are written solely by lazy writers for dumb readers. (I love Merlin's 5ives site, for example--witty brainfood.) That appealing to the "lowest common denominator" is being a sell-out. That sticking to a particular topic on a web site is not being true to your multi-faceted artistic self or whatever.

The other way to look at it is this: there's a usefulness and nobility in making media accessible to people outside of the inner circle. In fact, some of the biggest successes in pop culture involve straddling the delicate line of mainstream appeal and niche in-the-knowness, helping new people discover a new genre, a new topic of interest. A list of informational points--a perfectly fine rhetorical device--is a great way to open the door and welcome someone in for this purpose. When you run a site like Lifehacker that publishes up to 20 posts a day, a weekly list that rounds up all the items on a theme is doing a service for one's readers, not link-baiting. (Now, the whole question of why a site's doing 20 posts a day at all is another issue. I think of us as a radio station--whenever you tune in, there's always something new playing.)

I'd like to see Shedd and Merlin and others cite and counter all the crappy blog marketing advice and traffic inflation tricks with specific examples of how to do it better. Folks who have been on the internet for a long time like them have honed a better sense of where the line between being a douchey marketer and being a real, thoughtful human online is, and a LOT of folks could really benefit from that experience.

 
EXPLORE 43Folders THE GOOD STUFF

Popular
Today

Popular
Classics

An Oblique Strategy:
Honor thy error as a hidden intention


STAY IN THE LOOP:

Subscribe with Google Reader

Subscribe on Netvibes

Add to Technorati Favorites

Subscribe on Pageflakes

Add RSS feed

The Podcast Feed

Cranking

Merlin used to crank. He’s not cranking any more.

This is an essay about family, priorities, and Shakey’s Pizza, and it’s probably the best thing he’s written. »

Scared Shitless

Merlin’s scared. You’re scared. Everybody is scared.

This is the video of Merlin’s keynote at Webstock 2011. The one where he cried. You should watch it. »