Merlin’s weekly podcast with Dan Benjamin. We talk about creativity, independence, and making things you love.
Merlin’s weekly podcast with Dan Benjamin. We talk about creativity, independence, and making things you love.
”What’s 43 Folders?”
43Folders.com is Merlin Mann’s website about finding the time and attention to do your best creative work.
Our Most Popular PostsiTunes command line interfaceduus | Apr 13 2007iTunes command line interface read more »3 Comments
POSTED IN:
What Do You Carry With You?pooks | Feb 28 2006What Do You Carry With You? read more »POSTED IN:
Levenger in the UKmcnicks | Apr 19 2006Levenger in the UK read more »POSTED IN:
gtd-php: a web based, open source implementation of GTDgeodude | Jan 15 2006gtd-php: a web based, open source implementation of GTD read more »POSTED IN:
Life Hacks Live: Cory's NotesMerlin Mann | Mar 17 2005
Cory has posted his excellent notes from our talk at ETech today.
POSTED IN:
GTD tools for Windows Mobile 6 Smartphone?overflowing | Dec 15 2007Does anyone know of any software/freeware that can be used to manages lists for GTD on a Windows Mobile 6 Standard aka smartphone device? POSTED IN:
OmniFocus in SF, WWDCMerlin Mann | Jun 6 2007The Omni Mouth » OmniFocus demo at the San Francisco Apple Store My peeps at OmniGroup mentioned this, so I'll slide it in as well. I'll be appearing with my OmniBrethren at the Stockton Street Apple store on Thursday June 21st to demo OmniFocus. Huzzah:
Be there. Second, I heartily second Linda's suggestion that you email (omnifocus-wwdc at omnigroup dot com) if you're interested in doing an informal OF meet-up at WWDC. If you don't come, Ken and I will have to sit there and stare at each other and maybe talk about D&D. Please, don't make us talk about D&D. Update 2007-06-11 09:32:34 - OmniFocus at WWDC is scheduled. According to a recent Message of the Day in the OmniFocus beta:
This should be a lot of fun. If we can wangle A/V equipment. we'll do a demo of the latest version or OF, plus we'll be available to answer any questions about OmniFocus and just generally hang out. Nota bene: I believe that this is for WWDC pass holders only. So I apologize in advance if there's an iPortcullis in place, and really encourage you to come to the event at the Apple Store next week if you're around. Update 2007-06-12 23:24:49: Note room change above. We're now in the larger "Olympic Room." POSTED IN:
43F Google Group: How big is a project?Merlin Mann | Jun 30 2005Google Groups : 43 Folders [How big is a project?] Good thread on the Google Group about what constitutes a project, especially in terms of the GTD sense of the word (defined in the book as “a desired result that requires more than one action step”). I also used to find it confusing that there seemed to be an implication that you should only have one “next action” per project, which, gratefully, was completely a misreading on my part; you should have at least one next action per project, but you can and should have as many captured next actions as you know of. As I read it, the important part is that, if they’re on your TODO list, they need to be the next physical thing you could do to keep things moving—as opposed to stuff that can’t or shouldn’t be done yet for whatever reason (time, dependencies, waiting on other people, etc.). That deeper “back of the envelope” planning should happen in project support materials so that your TODO list is exclusively stuff that’s tee’d up and ready to go. Related posts:
POSTED IN:
How to deal with too many mail accounts?Chage | Aug 5 2007How to deal with too many mail accounts? read more »POSTED IN:
LazyWeb: Incoming mail with > n "To:" recipients?Merlin Mann | Jun 5 2006Related to "Thanks. No." and email filtering, I wonder how hard it would be for Mail.app, etc. to have a rule by which messages with more than n recipients in the "To:" line could be flagged for (depending on your preferences and courage) filtering, auto-archiving, or deletion. Maybe via AppleScript? I've heard from several friends who filter all non-work email for which they aren't the exclusive "To:" recipient, but it would be handy to have some flexibility in what your own magic number is -- plus of course what you'd then do with emails that exceed your limit would be up to you. But in an edge case, for example, if I get an email that went to [>=90 TO: recipients] and [<=25%] of the recipients were in my Address Book, the message would be flagged as "possible friend spam." (And, yes, I was once on a "Hey, this is funny" list that went to 96 people multiple times each day. Good times.) So, any thoughts? Bonus points if it's a rule that's easy for non-geeks to recreate in GUI apps like Mail.app, Entourage, and Outlook, etc. Comments open for brainstorming. (In related news, as I mentioned on MM.com, I'll soon be opening a thread on the Board to take suggestions on improving Thanks. No., so keep your powder dry on that one.) POSTED IN:
|
|
| EXPLORE 43Folders | THE GOOD STUFF |